Archive for the ‘Immigration’ Category

WHAT COUNTRIES BAN BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP?

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

November 2, 2007
Revised August 10, 2010

 By Elois Zeanah

How many developed  nations give birthright citizenship to illegal aliens and tourists?  Only the United States and Canada!  Most countries ban birthright citizenship because of security threats and because of unbearable costs which take invaluable resources and burden federal, state and local budgets and taxpayers.  

U.S. Representative Nathan Deal of Georgia, who introduced H.R. 1868 to ban automatic birthright citizenship, stated that 123 countries do not.  A sampling of these countries follows: 

Countries that Grant Automatic Birthright Citizenship 

Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Cameroon, Jamaica, Mexico, Pakistan, Spain, United States, and Venezuela. 

Countries that do NOT Grant Automatic Birthright Citizenship 

Algeria, Australia, Belgium, Columbia, Czech Republic, Egypt, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, India, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Korea, Kuwait, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and Zaire.

H.R. 1868, The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives in April to clarify the language/intent of “citizen” in the 14th Amendment to join other countries and stop the abuse of immigrants (illegal aliens and visitors on visas) who come to the United States to have children to give their children dual citizenship; to prevent them from entering military service in their countries; and to get free education, welfare, healthcare and other benefits paid for by U.S. taxpayers.  

Click http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1868 to read the bill, who the sponsor and co-sponsors are, and what the status is.  If your U.S. Congressman has not co-sponsored this legislation, please call his/her office and request that he/she do so. 

Notes and Sources: 

Ireland banned birthright citizenship in June 2004.  Ireland was the only country left in the European Union to grant automatic birthright citizenship to non-citizens.  (“Voters Reject Automatic Citizenship for Babies Born in Ireland,” New York Times International”, September 13, 2004.) 

 New Zealand changed its law to ban automatic birthright citizenship in 2006.  (“Birthright Citizenship Abolished in New Zealand,” January 1, 2006, Newstalk ZB).  http://www.cis.org/articles/1993/back.793.html:  “The Basic Right of Citizenship, A Comparative Study”, September 1993, by Sarah A. Adams. http://www.numbersusa.com/Interests/birthrightcitizenship.html.

 http://www.numbersusa.com/content/ on August 9,2010, reports the dates the following countries banned birthright citizenship to children of non-citizens:  Australia (2007); New Zealand (2006); Ireland (2005); France (1993); India (1987); United Kingdom (1983); and Portugal (198).

ILLEGAL — THAT’S THE MAGIC WORD

Monday, July 12th, 2010

By Lucy Kubiszyn

            “THERE can be  no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an America at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag…We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”         – Theodore Roosevelt 1907

            I wonder what old Teddy would think about the current illegal immigration issue and the attack by our own government on the people of the State of Arizona. Drugs dealers run rampant on our southern border, and heinous types of crimes are prevalent. This is not a new problem; rather it is one that has festered for years on our border with Mexico. Some of my Texas friends who live in border town like Corpus Christi, McAllen and El Paso have reported such  criminal activity for years.

            It isn’t that we discriminate against immigrants. My husband’s grandparents came over through Ellis Island from Poland and Italy. We are a nation of immigrants, but these earlier groups became American citizens. They came legally, followed the rules, learned the English language and became contributing members of society. This is not the case with these new arrivals who sneak across our border.

            During the early 1990s, I attended a marketing conference in San Diego where the keynote speaker made a statement I didn’t fully understand at the time, but one that I never forgot. She said: “By the year 2000 the United States will no longer be a melting pot. Rather, our country will have become a salad bowl.” This is what we are now dealing with.

            So what can ordinary citizens do? Pay attention to what is happening around you and vote. In November we have an opportunity to begin to take back our country. Support candidates who support conservative causes. It is true. WE ARE ALL ARIZONANS!

Obama and Democrats are Like Thelma and Louise

Tuesday, May 4th, 2010

By Elois Zeanah

Remember that 1991 move “Thelma and Louise”?  Remember how it ends?  Two women are on a road trip and decide to floor the gas pedal to accelerate their car over the cliff and commit suicide.  The film ends with a freeze frame of the car in mid-air.  The women are laughing and screaming with the thrill of the ride – with no concern for the crash to follow. 

This is the image that Obama and his Democrat congress bring to mind.  They are determined to floor the gas pedal to drive our economy off the fiscal cliff — but they are enjoying the ride and giddy with the thrill of their victory over the American people.

Under President Obama, the meaning of “transfer of wealth” is broadening like a tide of red ink.  Not only is Obama  working tirelessly to transfer wealth from Americans who earned it to those who did not, he works increasingly hard to transfer wealth from Americans to creditor nations who keep U.S. afloat. Red ink, like an oil slick, is rolling toward shore, sucking energy and life from every organism in its path.

 Astonishingly, while Obama ratchets up spending, which translates into more taxes and more debt, his Federal Reserve Chairman and House Budget Chief warn that federal deficits could cripple the economy permanently; and Obama ‘s deficit reduction commission confirm that disaster is inevitable unless the tide of red ink is rolled back.  All agree that entitlement cuts (and, of course, more tax increases!) are necessary to stem the red ink tide and avert disaster. 

Since everyone agrees that America’s economy is in crisis and that entitlements, the momentum that swells the rising tide of red ink, must be rolled back drastically, why isn’t Obama and the Democrat congress proposing a safety net of spending cuts to save the economy from drowning?  Why is Obama and his Democrat congress calling for cuts in Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid – while stoking public anger to push through another entitlement called amnesty? 

Amnesty will force taxpayers to pay about $90 billion more every year for immigrants who will receive $3 to $4 in public benefits for every $1 they pay in taxes, according to the Heritage Foundation.   This only deepens debt and explodes deficits.

When Obama and the Democrat congress drive us over the looming fiscal cliff, will they still be laughing?

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION: Why The Uproar Over Arizona’s Law?

Thursday, April 29th, 2010

By Elois Zeanah

Editorials, President Obama, the usual voices of leftist ideology, and 2012 presidential hopefuls who want to court Hispanic votes have piled on to criticize Arizona’s law.  Reasons their arguments are not credible follow.

Arizona law does not allow racial profiling.  Arizona’s new immigration law permits police to ask for citizenship documents only when there is “reasonable suspicion” and when police have already detained someone for violating another law such as a traffic violation.

U.S.C. 1304(e) has required immigrants to carry documents to prove they are in the country legally for over 50 years.  It’s no more unreasonable to ask an immigrant for documentation, as law requires, than it is to ask a driver of a vehicle to show a driver’s license, as law requires, when an individual is suspected of breaking the law.  It’s curious that the same people who oppose asking immigrants for “proof of citizenship” support the imposition of a new law to show “proof of purchase” of health care. 

States have the right to enforce federal laws as long as states codify federal laws as state laws.  Arizona’s law to make it a state crime for immigrants not to have immigration documents on their person simply follows the constitutional process to give the state the right to enforce federal law.  I believe the reason for the pro-amnesty uproar is that protestors are afraid the law will work through attrition — as is being proven – and other states will follow suit.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that police have the right to question whether a person is in the U.S. illegally.   In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court noted that police can detail illegal aliens and that the Court has “held repeatedly that mere police questioning does not constitute a seizure” under the Fourth Amendment.  The Arizona law incorporates existing authorities.

Those who use Arizona’s crackdown on illegal immigration to manufacture a crisis through editorials, unruly demonstrations, lawsuits, boycotts, and accusations of racial profiling are the same people who support amnesty, abdication of border security, more debt, and bloated government.  Amnesty will force taxpayers to pay about $90 billion more every year for immigrants who will receive $3 to $4 in public benefits for every $1 they pay in taxes, according to the Heritage Foundation.  Should we increase an already exploding deficit?

Partisans hope to use hyped rhetoric over Arizona’s law to pass amnesty.  If  politicians wanted to curb illegal immigration, they would rescind this Administration’s decision to stop building the border wall, hold employers accountable through E-Verify, end sanctuary cities, and end birthright citizenship to get rid of the welfare magnet.

Instead, politicians purposefully violate their oath to uphold the constitution and pander to lawbreakers to get votes.  States should protect their citizens and their sovereignty from federal shenanigans.

2010 CENSUS IS BACK-DOOR AMNESTY

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

By Elois Zeanah

Action Alert:  Contact Your U.S. Representatives Immediately

 The Obama Administration is using the 2010 census to give back-door amnesty to illegal immigrants to grab more power for Democrats in future elections.  This will further dismantle the U.S. Constitution and erode Voting Rights.  The only way to stop the President and Congress from this unconstitutional act is to contact our U.S. Representatives and ask them to vote for the David Vitter/Robert Bennett Census Amendment. This amendment was made to the FY2010 CJS (Commerce, Justice, Science) appropriations bill.  It would require the Census to include questions about citizenship and immigration status.   A vote is imminent.

The 2010 U.S. Census will count illegal immigrants as U.S. Citizens for the first time ever.  Unless Conservatives stop this, Liberals will use the 2010 U.S. Census to erase checks and balances that were put in place to keep elections honest.  Voter fraud committed to steal elections has already become a problem in many states.  If the U.S. Census is politicized in 2010, counting illegal immigrants will set precedent and forevermore skew the results of the Census, which in turn will impact elections.  

How does the Census Impact Elections?  The Census is used to:

  • Apportion seats in Congress.  Population determines the number of Congressional seats a state gets.  States with higher illegal immigration such as California and New York (which incidentally are “sanctuary cities” in violation of federal immigration law and teetering on bankruptcy) will get more Congressional seats and states with fewer illegal immigrants will lose Congressional seats. Counting illegal aliens in the 2010 U.S. Census will reward states that encourage illegal immigration and punish states that have not followed the law.
  • Distribute federal funds to states.  Federal funds (tax-dollars received from states) are allocated based on population. These funds amount to approximately $400 billion every year.  States that have more illegal aliens will get the lion’s share of federal dollars while states with fewer illegal immigrants will be denied their fair share.
  • Determine the number of votes states get for the Electoral College that elects the President of the United States.  States with higher illegal immigration will determine who becomes President.  

Conservatives must act now to keep Liberal Democrats from seizing illegitimate power by politicizing the non-partisan Census Liberals want amnesty because most illegal immigrants, due to their education and job skills, are poor.  If they have children born in the United States, and seventy-five percent do, illegal aliens automatically become eligible for tax-subsidized programs – the same as poor U.S. citizens.  Thus the cost of entitlement programs and fiscal deficits continue to skyrocket.  Studies show that illegal and legal Mexican households receive more welfare than U.S. citizens and consume more government benefits than they pay in taxes.  So why would Democrats encourage illegal immigration and amnesty?   Because, if given citizenship, illegal aliens would add to Democrat voting blocs. 

The Democrat Congress has already included loopholes in the Stimulus bill, S-CHIP, and the health care reform bill so that illegal immigrants can qualify for jobs and benefits.  This encourages more illegal immigration and further strains federal, state and local budgets. 

Democrats plan to use the Census to strengthen their stranglehold on power.   If illegal aliens are counted as U.S. citizens in the Census, this will further integrate illegal immigrants into the fabric of American culture and influence political outcomes.  Democrats know the majority of Americans oppose amnesty and that U.S. citizens want fiscal responsibility and deficits rolled back.  Democrats know that amnesty will push deficits higher.   Yet the President and Congress care more about perpetuating power than protecting our country from financial collapse.  This is not a time to import more poverty and expand entitlement programs.  This is a time to roll back spending and cut deficits.

It is urgent to stop backdoor amnesty!   Call your U.S. Representatives today, and ask them to vote for the Vitter Amendment and protect the integrity of the Census.

OBAMA’S CALL TO MINISTERS: Are Ministers Answering the Call from the President OR from God?

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

By Elois Zeanah

Since President Obama’s conference call to faith-based groups in mid-August 2009 to urge their support for government-controlled health care, I’ve heard ministers speak about our “responsibility” to make health care insurance a “right”.   

Health Care For Children 

One minister centered his comments on children who are uninsured.  He stated (incorrectly) that too many children in America go “unprotected” when the Bible tells us to take care of them.  Apparently, he is unaware that every child from a poor family has access to Medicaid and S-CHIP, and every person, adult or child, is treated at a hospital even when they cannot pay. 

Health Care For Illegal Immigrants 

Another minister opined that we should look at the health care issue biblically.  She used the parable of the Good Samaritan to make the case that illegal immigrants should be included in the health care plan and should receive tax-subsidized or free health care.  “What does it mean for us today to love our sick or uninsured neighbor as ourselves?” she asked.  

 I would ask in return if Jesus was referring to individuals as neighbors or to governments?  I can’t see how that parable can be interpreted that people should look to the government to take care of their needs and their neighbors’.  I would also ask if Christians have a biblical duty to obey laws and expect others to do the same?  Didn’t Jesus charge citizens to Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”?   While most people are aware that it is unlawful to enter the United States without permission, most people are unaware of another law that prohibits anyone from aiding and abeting illegal immigrants.  Christians should obey laws.
 

Do Christians Have a Moral Obligation to Push for Comprehensive Health Care For All? 

One minister pointed Christians to Old and New Testament scriptures where God and Jesus are continually referred to as “healers”.  Citing Isaiah 57:18:  “I have seen their ways, but I will heal them,” and Luke 14:4:  “So Jesus took him and healed him, and sent him away”, the minister asked:  “Can we Christians do any less?”   1 John 3:17 tells us:  ‘How does God’s love abide in anyone who has the world’s goods and sees a brother or sister in need and yet refuses help?’  From this perspective, do people of faith not have a moral responsibility to encourage our elected officials to pass comprehensive health care?”  The minister obviously feels Christians are obligated to support proposed comprehensive health care, and to answer the President’s call. 

Guilt Trip as Bully Club

Just as President Obama reached out to persuade faith leaders to use their influence to get their “flock” to back his health care proposal, politicians too often apply the guilt trip like a tourniquet to any issue that doesn’t have public support to persuade Americans to do something they don’t believe is right. I believe Christians have a moral obligation to follow their conscience and to fight injustices in our culture, which spring eternally from our government. 

Ministers, if they are going to preach on health care reform, should study what’s in the health care reform bill, who it will hurt as well as help, and what impacts (intended as well as unintended) will be on various groups, including the poor, as well as what freedoms and liberties granted by our Constitution will be sacrificed to serve a political agenda.  Only then can faith leaders know if they are being shepherds or sheep, and whether they’re following man or God.

ILLEGAL ALIENS: Can Non-Citizens Receive Health Care Under HB3200 OR Is This Claim Uninformed Rabble?

Friday, August 28th, 2009

By Elois Zeanah

Illegal aliens can receive benefits under the proposed bill.  The Congressional Research Service (CRS), the “research arm” for the United States Congress, issued a report titled “Treatment of Noncitizens in H.R. 3200 that confirms: 

  • “H.R. 3200 does not prevent non-citizens, whether they’re present in the U.S. legally or illegally, permanently or temporarily – from receiving health care benefits under the proposed plan.
  • Illegal aliens can also receive taxpayer subsidies for their health care – whether they choose government insurance or private insurance.
  • Loopholes in the bill are so gaping that even Mexican and Canadian citizens could participate in the health insurance exchange.

The CRS specifically cited the absence in the bill requiring that immigrants be “verified” as in the country legally before receiving health care insurance.  Because the language is so ambiguous, the CRS concluded that the Health Choices Commissioner would decide who was eligible under the plan.  This bureaucrat will, of course, interpret the vague wording according to the wishes of those who appointed him. 

What is the Intent of the President and Congress? 

“These loopholes were deliberate and intended to extend benefits to illegal aliens, while allowing Members of Congress to deny those facts to the American people,” stated Dan Stein, President of FAIR (Federation for American Immigration Reform).

 

  • An amendment to the House Ways & Means Committee bill to bar illegal aliens from enrolling in the proposed public option or receiving the “affordable credits” toward private insurance was voted down.  The amendment by Rep. Dean Heller (R-Nevada) to apply the same eligibility verification procedures that are now used for Medicaid to prove citizenship was voted down on a party-line vote.  This system is the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system.
  • Amnesty groups have expressed pleasure at the wording and have stated that the bill allows illegal aliens to receive health care benefits.

Fact or Uniformed Rabble? 

Stein stated:  “For the past month, irate citizens, concerned that their tax dollars will be used to fund health care for illegal aliens, have been unfairly portrayed as uninformed rabble by their elected representatives and a host of media organizations.  It’s time for the politicians to close the loopholes, and for the media establishment to acknowledge that they got it wrong.” 

The Congressional “research arm” has spoken:  Illegal aliens can receive benefits under the bill.   Citizens, once again, have proven they aren’t duped by ambiguous language that gives the President, Congress, and the media deniability, and by attempts of politicians to blatantly mislead U.S. citizens of their intent!

BUDGET DEFICIT NOW $9,000,000,000,000: How much is Due to Greed and Chicanery?

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

By Elois Zeanah

“It should be the highest ambition of every American to extend his views beyond himself, and to bear in mind that his conduct will not only affect himself, his country, and his immediate posterity; but that its influence may be co-extensive with the world, and stamp political happiness or misery on ages yet unborn.” –George Washington

Our nation must find a way to stop its financial hemorrhaging.  Our economy cannot sustain this level of bleeding (borrowing and spending). The Obama administration raised its 10-year budget deficit projection by $2 trillion to $9 trillion.  (The national debt is already $11.7 trillion.) The White House report showed the public debt doubling by 2019 and reaching three-quarters the size of the entire national economy.  This is hard to comprehend. 

One way to understand its impact on our economy is to put it in the context of a one-dollar bill.  Fold the dollar into thirds.  Then unfold two thirds.  This represents our national debt.  Our nation cannot survive on one-third of our economic output.  The result would be horrific – not only to our generation but on “ages yet unborn”.

A book “National Suicide: How Washington is Destroying the American Dream from A to Z” by an investigative reporter, Martin Gross, to be released in September 2009, is about the outrageous expenditures that American taxpayers are forced to fund. Some payments are for programs that don’t do the job intended, others are to achieve political goals.  A few examples among the book’s revelations are:

·        $700 billion a year is spent on welfare, “amounting to $65,000 for each poor family of four, yet we still have the poor with us.”[1] 

·        “Both political parties secretly encourage illegal immigration (Democrats for votes, Republicans for cheap labor) and then reward the immigrants’ children with automatic U.S. citizenship.”[2] 

·         1,000 duplicate programs waste billions.

·        “Medicare and Medicaid waste $150 billion a year dealing with doctor and hospital fraud.”[3] 

·        “$45 billion a year is wasted on ‘improper payments’ and even more on ‘unnecessary agencies.’”[4] 

Cal Thomas writes, “This book will keep your blood pressure up and your motivation to do something about overspending high into the next election.  Publisher’s Weekly wrote in its review:  ‘A fiery A-Z compendium of government greed, chicanery and plain incompetence.  Gross enjoys a good rant, but his criticism are sound and well-supported.”[5]

A good place for Americans to start to hold Washington politicians accountable for their “greed and chicanery”, is to demand that current bills on health care reform that do nothing to stop the financial hemorrhaging must be scuttled!  Like the dollar bill illustration above, only one-third of House Bill 3200 is about health care.  The rest, according to a legislative consultant who appeared on a Fox News program, is about pet programs, totally pork!

Federal government programs are riddled with fraud as a rule.  They “are inherently vulnerable to bribery, fraud, conflicts of interest, and collusion.  There is an old adage that where there is money to be made, fraud is not far behind, like bees to honey.”[6]  This is a primary reason for Americans to insist that government “keep its hand off our health care”.  Examples of fraud in federal programs within the last year alone include:

·        The $750 billion Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP), signed by President Bush in October 2008.  Tens if not hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer money will be lost to fraud” within TARP.[7] 

·        The $787 billion stimulus package passed by Congress and signed into law in February 2009.  “Estimates are that $50 billion of stimulus money will be lost to fraud.”[8]

It’s past time for Washington to start purging costs from wasteful/inefficient government programs to stop the financial hemorrhaging.  It’s not time to pass a new entitlement of a health care bill that will explode deficits. 



[1] Cal Thomas “Deficit has gone far beyond being our children’s burden”, August 26, 2009

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Ibid.

[6]

[7] Quarterly Report to Congress, Office of the Special Inspector General for TARP, April 21, 2009 (source: “Stop Paying the Crooks” book, foreword by Newt Gingrich)

[8] Greg Morcroft, “Fraudsters eye huge stimulus pie, consultant says,” MarketWatch, June 12, 2009 (source:  Book, “Stop Paying the Crooks”, foreword by Newt Gingrich

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION: A California Crisis is Coming to Your State

Monday, July 13th, 2009

By Elois Zeanah

What do President Obama and CA Gov. Schwarzenegger have in common?   They both support sanctuary cities, in violation of federal immigration laws; they both have an economic crisis on their hands; and they both issue IOUs.  Schwarzenegger could dent the California economic catastrophe colossally by signing an executive order that California would no longer be an outlaw state.  President Obama could stave off the stampede of taxdollars going to illegal aliens and save the Union by signing an executive order that banned federal funds to sanctuary cities.   But neither will because both put politics over policy and potential votes and campaign contributions over economic stability.  As a result, a California crisis is coming to your state.  Amnesty will only hasten the day.  Let’s briefly examine how illegal immigration contributed to the California crisis.  

Illegal Immigration is a “Catastrophic Hit” to California’s Budget[1]   

California’s budget deficit is $26.3 billion, and just three items that fund illegal immigration are responsible for nearly half this deficit.  $10.5 billion per year is spent on just education, medical care, and incarceration for illegal immigrants.  These costs do not include welfare costs such as public housing and rent assistance, food stamps, free education and school lunches, Medicaid, SSI, unemployment benefits, Earned Income Tax Credit, and more.  While illegal immigrants are barred by federal law from received welfare benefits, they can use their children born in the U.S. to evade laws and get them anyway.  This is why “anchor babies” are also called “jackpot babies”.    

Anchor Babies 

Babies born to parents in the U.S. illegally are called “anchor babies” because they automatically become citizens and immediately “anchor” their illegal families to free federal, state, and local benefits.  45% of anchor babies are born to unwed Mexican teenagers.  They get on welfare immediately and can stay on welfare for life.  Birthright citizenship is an irresistible magnet to get free benefits.  There are about 400,000 new anchor babies born every year in the United States.  10% of all births in the U.S. are to illegal aliens.  In Los Angeles, 25% of all births are anchor babies.  One anchor baby is born every five minutes.   

A bill, H.R. 1868 to ban automatic birthright citizenship was introduced this year in the House of Representatives to end this costly injustice to American taxpayers and to our economy.  Most other countries ban birthright citizenship because of security threats and because of unbearable costs which take invaluable resources and burden federal, state and local budgets and taxpayers.  It is shameful and a travesty that politicians refuse to follow the example of other countries to protect our nation and our economy.  The U.S. is the largest of only 33 countries in the world that grant automatic birthright citizenship to children of illegal aliens and temporary visitors, while 122 countries do not. (If you’d like to see a sampling of other countries who banned automatic birthright citizenship, see the article, “What Countries Ban Birthright Citizenship,” elsewhere on this website.) 

If Gov. Schwarzenegger and President Obama were really serious about shaving costs to solve economic woes, both would support H.R. 1868 and urge its immediate passage to stimulate their respective economies. The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives in April to clarify the language/intent of “citizen” in the 14th Amendment to join other countries and stop the abuse of immigrants (illegal aliens and visitors on visas) who come to the United States to have children to give their children dual citizenship; to prevent them from entering military service in their countries; and to get free education, welfare, healthcare and other benefits paid for by U.S. taxpayers.    

Click http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1868 to read the bill, who the sponsor and co-sponsors are, and what the status is.  If your U.S. Congressman has not co-sponsored this legislation, please call his/her office and request that he/she do so.  

Welfare Magnet 

An L.A. Times article on July 10, 2009,[2] gives the example of an unemployed illegal Mexican immigrant who has birthed four of her five children in the United States.  Her four anchor babies “receive a total of about $650 each month from the state’s CalWorks program.  She also receives about $500 in federal food stamps and other vouchers” each month. 

Free benefits for children born in the United States is a welfare magnet as strong as jobs.  The problem has gotten so bad that twice as many illegal alien households receive U.S. welfare than citizen households.[3]   This should be encouragement enough for Gov. Schwarzenegger to sign an executive order that California will no longer violate federal laws and treat illegal residents the same as legal residents.  And the fact that taxpayers pay $90 billion every year on welfare for illegal for illegal aliens [4]should be an urgent reason for President Obama to sign an executive order to enforce the ban on outlaw sanctuary cities.  This one act alone would force California to trim its budget as nothing else would – and would stimulate the national economy in a way Obama’s$787 billion stimulus package cannot. Many states throughout the nation are facing bleak budgets and illegal immigration is a factor in all. 

California’s budget problems are grimmer but the crisis in California will hit every state in the Union unless something is done to stem the unsustainable costs of illegal immigration. 


[1] “Illegal Immigration again in the budget spotlight, LAT, July 10, 2009

[2] Ibid

[3] Center for Immigration Studies, “Use of Means-Tested Programs”.  29.9% of illegal Hispanic households receive benefits versus 14.8% of native citizens.

[4] Robert Rector, Heritage Foundation, October 29, 2006 on CNN:  http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.html

Why is Birthright Citizenship a Magnet as Strong as Jobs?

Sunday, July 12th, 2009

By Elois Zeanah

Consider this scenario:   

Put yourself in the shoes of a Mexican citizen still living in Mexico.  One day you get a phone call from friends and family in the U.S.  They’re having a party and invite you to join them in the U.S.  They tell you that you can make more in one hour than you can make in one day in Mexico.   

Then amidst all the party clatter at the other end of the phone, your callers drop the piñata of all surprises.  They tell you that not only can you make more in an hour than in a day in Mexico – but that the U.S. will pay you richly to come to the U.S. as an illegal alien and have a baby. 

At this point, you don’t know whether the loud party at the other end of the phone is out of control and your friends are weaving fantasy, or to put on your running shoes and become the latest illegal alien. 

Still holding the phone, you ask in disbelief, “The U.S. does what?” 

“Yes,” the answer comes back, “it’s true.  The U.S. makes it easy to cross the border, easy to find jobs, and the U.S. pays us to have babies.” 

Your friends at the other end of the phone drop another surprise:  When your anchor baby turns 18, you become a U.S. citizen – unless you get amnesty first!  If you were that Mexican, what would you do?  Is birthright citizenship not an irresistible magnet?

If I’ve gotten your attention, please (1) read the articles on this website and learn about the problem of birthright citizenship which is one of the most urgent issues of illegal immigration that needs to be addressed, and (2) check the website below to see if your U.S. Representatives have co-sponsored this legislation.  If not, please call his/her office and request that he/she do so.          Check http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1868 to read H.R. 1868, who the sponsor and co-sponsors are, and what the status is.